The White Establishment – Part III

By Vusi Moloi © 2009

The White Establishment - Part I
The White Establishment – Part II

The Fundamental Premise

The fundamental premise of the White Establishment is rooted in the fact that the English decided to grow their territorial size by invading their neighbours like the Welsh, the Scot and the Irish with the result that unifying the conquered lands under a single English flag against the will of the peoples of those conquered lands imposed a perpetual situation of antagonistic contradictions with respect to the principles of democracy, fairness and neighbourliness.

Invasion of the Neighbours

Without regard for the rules which govern mutual respect among neighbours, the English embarked on the conquest of Wales, Scotland and Ireland in order to build a stronger empire.

The Fall of Wales

Wales fell under England on December 11, 1282 when the great Welsh Prince (son of King Gruffydd ap Llywelyn Fawr) Llywelyn ap Gruffydd who fought on behalf of his people was killed in an ambush on that day and his forces were subdued by the English imperialists. King Gruffydd had previously been offered a bribe of affluent property in England in exchange for giving up control of his beautiful motherland Wales. He rejected the bribery and King Edward I, who had been given Wales by his father, unleashed his imperialist forces upon the people of Wales. Interestingly, the present day descendents of Wales continue to hold their head high despite this crushing defeat with this motto “Cymru Am Byth” which means Wales Forever!


Caernarfon Castle - Wales - from LearnFree2007 of Youtube

The Fall of Scotland

Scotland fell under England on May 1st, 1707 and England became known as Great Britain having absorbed the independent Kingdom of Scotland. This concept of Great Britain was introduced by Queen Anne of England who became the first ruler under this system.


The Flower of Scotland - james331933 of Youtube

The Fall of Ireland

Ireland fell under England on January 1st, 1801. When the Anglo-Irish Treaty became effective on December 6, 1921 as a result of ending the Irish War of Independence; what was then known as Great Britain became the United Kingdom.


The fighting irish - from Thuglordrpt of Youtube

We have just presented a distilled version of the genesis of the white establishment. Why are these facts relevant to our analytical discussion of the White Establishment? It shall become clear to you that the current behaviour of the English is rooted in these events with reference to the PDP Syndrome and the Psychopathic Behaviour of Oppression.

The PDP Syndrome

The PDP Syndrome is derived from my scholarly work Perversity of Disconnected Pimples whereby a person with pimples becomes fixated around two things (1) to arrest the growth of the pimples and to subdue them in this way and (2) to eliminate them. A pimple is a very interesting phenomenon. It rises up when least expected and refuses to go away once it has become bevelled. It usually grows at night. In the poem Life Must Go On we read these lines:

“When Mmatshilo instructed the people
Adversity bevelled like a stubborn pimple
Despite conjugating the vibes
of permanent emancipation” Moloi, Moloi, The Indomitable Mongoose, ©2004

The pimple starts off with a benign beginning and then gets stronger and harder to resist as time progresses. People who grow pimples resort to a variety of techniques designed to suppress them. Whatever technique is employed, in the ferocious campaign against the pimples, it usually comes back to haunt the person because of the battle scars left afterwards especially if the person decided to carry out a scorched earth policy against the most stubborn pimples.

A pimple warrior ends up developing a set of symptoms known as PDP from Perversity of Disconnected Pimples as described above. This is the syndrome whereby a fighter of pimples develops psychopathic tendencies which usually become fused with schizophrenic behaviour. At this juncture I would like to lay the groundwork with the scientific analysis of psychopathic and schizophrenic tendencies before delving further into the PDP Syndrome.

Psychopathic Tendencies

We are interested in two features of psychopathic behaviour i.e. (1) disconnectedness from reality and (2) emotional numbness.

Disconnectedness From Reality

A psychopathic individual is disconnected from reality. There is no interest with respect to appreciating and embracing reality. This is because reality is objective and one must either accept or reject its guidance. This is theoretically due to the fact that reality upsets the sense of stability and mental equilibrium so that reality is perceived as a potentially threatening experience. This does not mean that the individual rejects all reality in toto but rather the individual tunes out any type of reality that creates a feeling of instability with respect to the individual’s sense of control.

Emotional Numbness

The fundamental premise of a psychopathic behaviour is that of being devoid of empathy. That means that what sets a person apart in terms of psychopathic tendencies from the one without is the fact that a psychopathic individual is emotionally numb and perhaps even emotionally dead. If you tell a psychopathic person about the emotional pain you felt when you lost a job interview, he or she may not make a specific response to your pain. If they do respond at all, they may say something which is not relevant to the topic of pain. The act of ignoring someone’s pain when it’s an important point of discussion for them, is a psychopathic behaviour. Usually a person with a psychopathic behaviour can hurt you, harm you, abandon you or even take your life.

How then does a psychopathic person connect with others if they are incapable of emotional connection? They interact with others on the basis of the car salesman approach. A car salesman is motivated by one thing towards you and that is to sell you the car. He will describe the attractive features of the car to pique your interest. He may not even give you a chance to express your reaction because he may lose control over the situation and never make the sale. They only pick snippets of your reaction and counter any hesitation you might have by telling you about how much this car will be good for you.

They may not even give you the opportunity to lift the hood of the car just in case you find out that the car has no engine. So they are trying to sell you a car without an engine and they have put in place some rules in fine print which stipulate that once you sign for the purchase order, the car is yours even though you may discover afterwards that the car doesn’t have an engine. For this reason, it’s not in the interest of the salesman to lift the hood so that you can inspect the car for yourself. They would rather inspect the car themselves on your behalf or get someone with “credentials” to inspect the car for you.

Schizophrenic Behaviour

Schizophrenia refers to the fact that a person has a split personality. There are two elements of schizophrenic behaviour which are of interest to our analysis i.e. (1) paranoid behaviour and (2) oversensitive behaviour to certain stimuli.

Paranoid Behaviour

A schizophrenic person usually thinks that others are out to get him or her. He or she feels threatened by others. Even though psychiatry tends to mystify this type of behaviour, the causes are based in reality. A schizophrenic person carries the mental footprints of a situation which engender this feeling of paranoia. He or she may not be able to articulate or express this experience but we know that it’s connected with some lingering memories which evoke a sense of being threatened. We can describe such a phenomenon as a survival reducing experience.

Oversensitivity To Select Stimuli

Another feature of a schizophrenic behaviour is the enhanced response to certain stimulus phenomena. The individual does not respond equally to all stimuli but will overreact to certain test stimuli. This is because the test stimulus bears strong resemblance with respect to the residual memory that contributes to the individual’s sense of paranoia. Overreaction is an attempt on the part of the individual to mitigate survival risks.

The above mentioned features of a psychopathic and schizophrenic behaviour i.e. disconnectedness, emotional numbness, paranoia and oversensitivity engender another behavioural feature of behavioural rigidity. The individual becomes robotic in carrying out the repertoire of a certain behaviour. Now that we have established a scientific definition of these behaviour patterns, we can now apply this in our analysis of the White Establishment.

Psychopathic Behaviour of Oppression

Oppressing others requires a psychopathic as well as a schizophrenic behaviour so that the oppressor is emotionally numb towards the pain of the oppressed while at the same time championing the principles of democracy. The oppressor must also remain disconnected from the realities of the oppressed. This engenders a paranoid behaviour so that the oppressed are denied opportunities to freely express their viewpoints. This is how the psychopathic tendencies are cultivated and encouraged.

When the brave and resisting leader of the Welsh Gruffydd was killed in an ambush by the forces of the English, there was a jubilant celebration among the English in the streets of England. The English became emotionally numb towards the plight of the Welsh. When the great female warrior and medicine woman who resisted the English imperialism of British South Africa Company in Zimbabwe Mbuya Nehanda was brutally executed in broad daylight by the English, another rejoicing took place among the English.

This begs the question; how can one human being rejoice after inflicting pain upon others for what is otherwise their rightful birthright? This is only facilitated by a psychopathic behaviour. One must be disconnected from the reality of being an invader and somehow recast oneself as a humanitarian intervener in a situation where the savage natives would otherwise perish. At a certain time in history, the English were bringing religious salvation to the uncivilized societies around the globe. Today, they are bringing democracy to the rogue states around the globe.

Fighting Pimples is a Non-Trivial Exercise

As mentioned above, fighting pimples is not an easy task because one can become consumed by it at the expense of other important tasks which means that the fighter of pimples usually loses perspective on things. Another puzzling thing about the pimple is that you cannot fight it at its early stage because the pimple is still invisible and too embedded in the underlying skin and would leave an indelible scar on the skin if forcibly removed. You must let it grow and then at some point you can try to pop it with needle, safety pin or something of that effect.

Pimples can be embarrassing in the sense that they don’t obey the owner or toe the line. They grow at their own time at their own pace and their existence cannot be denied. What ends up happening is that since their existence is undeniable and you can’t really eliminate them, then some people resort to masking techniques to make them invisible. This strategy of masking is designed to falsify the existence of the pimples and thus deceive the outside world about the real deal in terms of the existence of the pimples.

The person who carries out this strategy of falsification gets caught in their own web of tricks and becomes fixated around the existence and resistance of the pimples and ends up developing a PDP syndrome as already described above. It probably would help if these pimples could be subdued under a single controlling system so that when you apply one solution to that system all the pimples can fall in line. That is an impossibility in itself because the growth points and geo-location of the pimples are beyond control. They have their own objective existence. For some of you who don’t know what is an objective existence, let me explain it to you. Suppose you and me look at a tree. I make a statement that this is a tree. We both will agree that it’s a tree. That’s because the tree is objective which means the tree exists independently of our mind or wish. Thus the pimple’s existence is objective and it cannot be controlled through our minds or wish. We must deal with the reality of the pimple in order to reach some kind of efficacy in dealing with it.

Applying the PDP to the English Establishment

The English have sought and succeeded in capturing the lands of other nations like the Welsh, the Scots and the Irish. They then ruled over all of these nations like they were ruling a single nation under a single English crown. However, these nations were independent with their distinct identities and crowns. Moreover, their geo-location remained distinct from England. They have their own GPS coordinates. They are like the pimples which cannot be unified. They grow at their own time and pace regardless of the wishes of the English. This creates an antagonistic contradiction in the concept of the United Kingdom and this antagonistic contradiction characterizes the behaviour of the English with respect to the non-English.

A celebrated British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain once wailed that he wished the English were like the Romans and the Germans. Why is that? The Romans and the Germans had something the English didn’t have and that was a unified country and peoples. They didn’t have to deal with the problem of territorial disconnectedness as is the case with the English. Since these constituent peoples of the United Kingdom were forced against their will, this meant that the English developed a PDP syndrome. This is the same syndrome that afflicts a teenager with nasty pimples. In fact the English treated the Welsh, the Scot and the Irish as nasty pimples that needed to be arrested, subdued or crushed.

Computational Neuroscience

There is an interesting interdisciplinary field of study known as Computational Neuroscience. This is basically a fusion of Computer Science and Neuroscience in the modelling, analysis and understanding of how the brain works. Within this field there is psychophysics which specifically looks at the interaction between a physical stimulus and its mental correlate. The founder of this branch of study is a German experimental psychologist and physicist Dr. Gustav Fechner. He derived a formula S = KLogI which basically says that the functional relationship between a physical stimulus on the one hand and its mental correlate on the other is governed by a logarithmic function. The K in the formula refers to some constant while the I refers to the actual physical stimulus and the S is the resulting sensation. Although other scholars like Stevens have come along to propose changes on this formula i.e. replacing a logarithm with a power function; my own independent mathematical analysis using the Thekwini Project shows that the relationship between a physical stimulus and its behavioural correlate is better modelled by logarithmic equations and calculus confirms this.

Why is the logarithmic system relevant to the question of the White Establishment? A logarithmic change is usually small and subtle but effective in its interaction with other objects. Since a logarithmic change is small, its subtle changes can be observed over a long time. If you were to take a segment over a domain of a logarithmic system, it would be difficult to notice a difference with a naked eye even though we know that there is a difference using computational methods.

The English have developed behaviour patterns which can be better modelled using the logarithmic system. For example the English are obsessed with optics i.e. how things look. They are interested in the subtleties of how they conduct themselves and the image they project to the outside world. They even worry about how they hold a fork and knife, the whiteness of a napkin and the sequence of the course meal. When an English person is preparing to give a speech in public, he spends most of the time, not developing the substance but rather honing the optical effects of the presentation. When you analyze the English techniques of public speaking, it’s all about presentation and less about substance. These things pertain to subtle changes and enhancements of reality. This stems from the fact the English came to a realization that it was impossible to unify independent nations by force and so one must rather spend more time on the cosmetics of the reality as opposed to the substance of reality. After all it’s cheaper to paint a pimple in such an artistic fashion that it blends seamlessly with the natural skin than to pay a dermatologist who will investigate the cause and apply the correct treatment regiment to eliminate the problem once and for all.

Microscopic Mind Partitioning

The cumulative effect of what has been outlined so far results in a behaviour pattern referred to as MMP from Microscopic Mind Partitioning. Maybe on another article we shall have an opportunity to expatiate on the MMP behaviour but for now we will make a few remarks on this important segment. MMP is about the mind acting as a microscope with the purpose of partitioning a stimulus object in front of it.

To understand MMP you must understand how the microscope works. First let’s pay tribute to the African engineer, doctor, and inventor Abbas Ibn Firnas who invented corrective lenses during the 9th century. The invention of a microscope was made possible by this African of North African heritage. At the time he invented the corrective lenses, Abbas Ibn Firnas lived in Spain where he was born and was part of the Moors who ruled the present day Peninsula of Iberia. The Persian physicist Alhazen who later left the present day Iran to live in North Africa and wrote a book on optics was inspired by this secret African knowledge since the African intellectuals possessed an advanced technology of converting sand into glass for purposes of magnification of text for reading, long before the Europeans.

Now that we have paid tribute to those who have gone before us, we can proceed with the discussion on the role of microscopes. Essentially a microscope enables the natural eye to see what is otherwise difficult, if not impossible, to see.

The person with MMP has a mind that works like a microscope. They see things which others may not see and react against those things which they see. If there is a subtle flaw or a potential soft spot on another person, an MMP individual will zero in on those spots and poke holes into them in order to undo that person’s state of humanity. This individual is very friendly and kind to others but reacts differently towards another who appears in the radar of his or her microscopic mind. This unusual behaviour was observed in Ottawa. There is no sense of remorse in this behaviour and it bears the hallmarks (described earlier) of psychopathic and schizophrenic tendencies.

Conclusion

In this article The White Establishment – Part III we dealt with the behaviour patterns and the psychology that drives such behaviour patterns. We demonstrated, using the analysis of computational neuroscience and Thekwini Project, that the psychopathic and schizophrenic tendencies are a prerequisite for an oppressive behaviour to be carried out.

About the Author

A former South African Television Journalist, Vusi Moloi is a published author of a contextual poetry book, A Goodbye To My Little Troubles, and maintains a blog, "Zulumathabo" on the Internet. In addition to writing, Mr. Moloi also works as a software engineer.